Logan Webber
What steps need to be taken regarding carbon policy to support global clean energy transitions?
Rising Energy Demand
Energy Inequality
Climate Change
Carbon pricing has become one of the most widely adopted tools for reducing emissions, yet global implementation remains scattered and uneven. As of 2024, more than 110 carbon pricing instruments exist worldwide, including emissions trading systems (ETS), carbon taxes, and crediting mechanisms. However, these vary widely in scope, price levels, and coverage. In many regions, carbon is priced too low to impact societal behaviors meaningfully, and the absence of international coordination allows corporations to shift operations to jurisdictions with weaker regulation, “gaming the system” through regulatory arbitrage.
Over 110 carbon pricing instruments exist worldwide, yet the landscape remains fragmented, split across taxes, trading schemes, and crediting mechanisms, with little standardization. Source: World Bank Group
The issue isn’t a lack of carbon policy, but a lack of alignment and follow-through. Most carbon pricing schemes fail to provide clear investment signals for long-term decarbonization, especially in heavy industry and transportation. Meanwhile, new clean energy technologies — including carbon capture, advanced nuclear, and long-duration energy storage — often struggle to secure funding beyond the lab. This financing gap, known as the “Valley of Death,” is where promising technologies stall before reaching commercial scale. Critical innovations risk being stranded without better bridge mechanisms between public research and private deployment.
Developing tech often fails to traverse the “Valley of Death,” an intermediate R&D stage between laboratory-scale prototyping and real-world implementation, due to insufficient funding and resources during the transition from public to private industry. Source: IdeaToValue.com
A more effective policy framework combines robust pricing tools, coordinated incentives, and equitable targets. Proposals like an international carbon price floor – advocated by the IMF and supported by the IEA – would require high-emitting nations to adopt a shared minimum price on emissions, while allowing for flexibility in implementation. At the same time, public investment programs like the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act help de-risk emerging technologies and accelerate commercialization. Finally, effective policy must support decarbonization in emerging markets and developing economies without forcing a premature end to economic growth. The global energy transition will stall if these economies are not well-positioned to leapfrog fossil fuel development.
Without clearer carbon policy and long-term investment signals, even the most ambitious climate goals will remain politically popular but practically out of reach.
While global CO₂ emissions are projected to plateau through 2027, emissions in emerging regions like Southeast Asia and India are still rising, highlighting the need for equitable and scalable policy action. Source: IEA Electricity 2025
Learn More